Room 3B

53 notes

Now That I’ve Had Some Time to Process the Thor News…


I’m honestly more annoyed than ever. This is not Marvel attempting to be progressive or give us more female characters. It’s a cheap sales stunt, and I’m not fooled. Going on The View to announce a female Thor? Going on Colbert to announce a black Cap? All about a year before Age of Ultron is released and these changes get debooted back to status quo? I honestly don’t know what they’re thinking.

(To clarify, I’m not upset about Cap. I love Sam and if Steve can’t be Cap for a while, then he’s a great choice to wear the costume. But I can recognize it for the marketing gimmick that it is.)

Back to Thor. While replacement Caps have had some small success (Bucky, for example), there has literally never been a Thor fill-in people got excited about. Nobody cares about Thunderstrike. Nobody remembers Thor Girl. People like Beta Ray Bill enough, now, but there was tons of controversy when he first came out. Because people thought they were going do the exact story they have chosen for this new Thor with him.

So what does this mean? They’re setting this new character up for failure. They know fans have not been receptive to others wielding Mjolnir in the past, but they’re going to do it anyways. And they’re going to make it a woman, and they’re going to market it out the wazoo. So when it flops and they go back to the status quo, they shrug and take no responsibility for it, claiming that female characters just don’t sell. And we’re actually set back rather than moving forward.

Personally, I’m a bit offended that Marvel thinks I would care about this new Thor just because she is a woman when I haven’t cared about any of the past stand-ins. I also realize I’m not the person they’re trying to appeal to. There are plenty of women who will eat this shit up. Tumblr proves that. And I’m not saying you can’t be excited just because I’m not. But please please please do not mistake their yearly “Look at what we’re doing! We’re changing so much! Come buy our shit!” as actual interest by Marvel in promoting female characters.

They have plenty of absolutely amazing female characters they could be  putting in the spotlight, instead. Characters who have their own origins and aren’t inextricably tied to a previously existing male hero. Storm, for example, is getting her own solo comic soon. Why didn’t Marvel take that to The View? Because it’s not women they care about. It’s shock value.

(via helshades)

Filed under Mh-mh. >_>

211 notes


instead of making thor unworthy and replacing him with a female to have more female marvel characters, why couldnt they just give a solo series to thor’s granddaughters??

(via mmmagpie)

Filed under Yeah Pretty much If anything bad happens to the real Thor they'll have to face ME I mean people like Thor because they like Thor right? It's not like whosoever holds that hammer will suddenly be your favourite character Even if the new character is awesome I don't see how I'll manage not to be extremely pissed on Thor's behalf O_O

12,809 notes

Take boots, for example. [Vimes] earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

—Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms (via rascalbot)

This is how it is really expensive to be poor. 

(via everydayworldasproblematic)

(via helshades)

Filed under I WAS RE-READING THIS PART TODAY And I wanted to force all my colleagues to read it and and admit that no one is better than Terry Pratchett And Vimes Terry Pratchett ILU The boots theory of socio-economic unfairness

175 notes


As I wrote in the instagram post of this thing here, I am about to put this in my etsy shop… but I thought to ask here on tumblr if anyone would be interested first uvu/

Sooo. This (25x18cm) horny horned grumpy thing here will be absolutely disgusted to be bought by your for €40 ($55). Send me an ask in case you’re interested! (and if you like this, please reblog? :°D)

Filed under Signal boost for my awesome mammal Look at that fantastic fur *U* He's blue da ba dee da ba die Jotun Loki horny edition cagnone friend art